# CGI............

**URL:** <https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791>\
**Category:** Ghostbusters: Answer the Call (2016)\
**Created:** [September 7, 2007, 2:07am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791 "2007-09-07T02:07:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ecto79](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/ecto79/32/5924_2.png) [@ecto79](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ecto79)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2007, 2:07am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/1 "2007-09-07T02:07:41Z")

</div>

Now if they decided to make the movie, in CGI animation i hope they Film it in motion capture. If they wont do live action its almost like it, if you remember the Movie “Final Fantasy spirits within”, it was computer animated but it looked realalistic. Lets all hope to god its not Shrek cgi… :?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cythusly](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/cythusly/32/188_2.png) [@Cythusly](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Cythusly)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2007, 2:09am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/2 "2007-09-15T02:09:37Z")

</div>

I could see them going either way… kind of a dark, gritty, realistic sort of feel to the whole thing or going the Shrek or TMNT route and it looking very stylized. Sadly, I’d probably say they’re going to do be going the 2nd, more childish route. So, there probably won’t be much mo-cap since most of those characters seem to be gumby-humans anyway. Either way, we get a new Ghostbusters movie- YAY!

-Tyler

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thegreatgalling](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/thegreatgalling/32/131867_2.png) [@thegreatgalling](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/thegreatgalling)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2007, 4:46am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/3 "2007-10-02T04:46:38Z")

</div>

The more time that passes the more and more I think its not happening. Its really ridiculous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ecto1gb](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/ecto1gb/32/5942_2.png) [@ecto1gb](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ecto1gb)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2008, 3:59pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/4 "2008-01-08T15:59:54Z")

</div>

Didn’t they make the movie 300 with some kind of animation? 3D animation and computer graphics .. I heard everything in that movie was all computer generated, even the guys bodies. I still think the boys can pull off another GB movie, who cares about their ages with a the shit they can do with movies these days I’m sure hollywood could make it happen. I hated the way TMNT came out, I like the live action movie better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thegreatgalling](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/thegreatgalling/32/131867_2.png) [@thegreatgalling](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/thegreatgalling)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2008, 1:59am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/5 "2008-01-15T01:59:45Z")

</div>

Motion capture would be cool as long as they could make the chacters a bit more skinny then they are now! I like the idea of the game/movie taking place closer to the time of GB2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RavenEffect](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e95f7d/32.png) [@RavenEffect](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/RavenEffect)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 3:51pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/6 "2008-04-22T15:51:34Z")

</div>

Yeah, they could definitely go either way with it. I didn’t see Beowulf, but I did see the trailers for it, and from what I could tell, that was all animation. However, you could barely tell. It looked very realistic. In the trailers, I saw Angelina Jolie in one of the roles, and it looked EXACTLY like Angelina Jolie… you know… except for the fact that she didn’t have a human body. LOL!

That is how I’d want them to do it if they went with a new CGI movie. If they have to go the animation route, I’d want it to look as real as possible. It could actually be a good move if they make it look that realistic, because hopefully it could still allow them the flexibility to make the boys in gray look like the did in the other movies, instead of looking much older, out of shape, and REALLY being the boys in gray. LOL! Honestly, I find it highly doubtful that we are even going to get that anyway, so I’m just happy we are getting [the video game](https://www.gbfans.com/wiki/games/ghostbusters-the-video-game).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lupo\_the\_Butcher](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/f0a364/32.png) [@Lupo\_the\_Butcher](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Lupo_the_Butcher)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 7:48pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/7 "2008-04-22T19:48:07Z")

</div>

> [@RavenEffect](#):
>
> Yeah, they could definitely go either way with it. I didn’t see Beowulf, but I did see the trailers for it, and from what I could tell, that was all animation. However, you could barely tell. It looked very realistic. In the trailers, I saw Angelina Jolie in one of the roles, and it looked EXACTLY like Angelina Jolie… you know… except for the fact that she didn’t have a human body. LOL!

I only saw Beowolf on the small screen and it looked lame. It certainly could not in ANY way be mistaken for something shot with real actors.

On the subject of motion capture, I’ve never seen it done well (with the exception of Gollum in TLOTR), and think it’s greatly over rated. (I think the actors ham it up to make sure the motion is captured, which makes the final product look fake. Take a look at the dancing conductors scene in Polar Express and tell me it looks like real dancing.)

I’d rather see Pixar do Ghostbusters the same way that they did The Incredibles. Now that was an exciting high quality joy-ride that another Ghostbusters should be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ROBOrob77](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/13edae/32.png) [@ROBOrob77](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ROBOrob77)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2008, 3:31am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/8 "2008-04-23T03:31:48Z")

</div>

> [@joekoomen](#):
>
> > [@RavenEffect](#):
> >
> > Yeah, they could definitely go either way with it. I didn’t see Beowulf, but I did see the trailers for it, and from what I could tell, that was all animation. However, you could barely tell. It looked very realistic. In the trailers, I saw Angelina Jolie in one of the roles, and it looked EXACTLY like Angelina Jolie… you know… except for the fact that she didn’t have a human body. LOL!
> 
> I only saw Beowolf on the small screen and it looked lame. It certainly could not in ANY way be mistaken for something shot with real actors.
> 
> On the subject of motion capture, I’ve never seen it done well (with the exception of Gollum in TLOTR), and think it’s greatly over rated. (I think the actors ham it up to make sure the motion is captured, which makes the final product look fake. Take a look at the dancing conductors scene in Polar Express and tell me it looks like real dancing.)
> 
> I’d rather see Pixar do Ghostbusters the same way that they did The Incredibles. Now that was an exciting high quality joy-ride that another Ghostbusters should be.

that might be cool, as long as they didn’t go overboard with the charactachers (not sure on spelling). I still a think a live action tv show would be cool with a new cast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rockmx8](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@rockmx8](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/rockmx8)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2008, 7:54am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/9 "2008-05-17T07:54:38Z")

</div>

CGI will do but Live Action could’ve been way better. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ecto-Blaster87](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/34f0e0/32.png) [@Ecto-Blaster87](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Ecto-Blaster87)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2008, 11:04pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/10 "2008-05-20T23:04:26Z")

</div>

Some said that is now or never, I would be trilled to see another GB in CGI. Hoping that the orignal actors does vocial talents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chris\_cgf](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/46a35a/32.png) [@Chris\_cgf](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Chris_cgf)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2008, 8:20am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/11 "2008-05-25T08:20:33Z")

</div>

I just hope they keep it dark like Ghostbuster 1 and not light it up 4 the kids : (

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![murphman](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/murphman/32/5872_2.png) [@murphman](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/murphman)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2008, 4:30pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/12 "2008-05-26T16:30:42Z")

</div>

Just found this on youtube… Aykroyd talking about GB3

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3reRA6yJ4Ds](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3reRA6yJ4Ds)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raystantz\_Italy](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a698b9/32.png) [@Raystantz\_Italy](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Raystantz_Italy)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2008, 7:17pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/13 "2008-05-26T19:17:05Z")

</div>

old news… that was a december interview

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zack](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/f6c823/32.png) [@Zack](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Zack)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2008, 8:36pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/14 "2008-05-26T20:36:10Z")

</div>

> [@Chris\_cgf](#):
>
> I just hope they keep it dark like Ghostbuster 1 and not light it up 4 the kids : (

yeah no demonic possessions or rotting corpse heads and skulls on pikes for me, please :angryvigo: :lol: jk I know what ya mean 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GoraK-11](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@GoraK-11](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/GoraK-11)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2008, 12:54am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/15 "2008-05-29T00:54:55Z")

</div>

if they do make a CGI movie, I hope they do it like Beowulf. If I see another CGI movie rip off the art style from the Incredibles, I will scream! And if ghostbusters ever did that, I would cry and walk out of the cinema.

Then contemplate whether some form of pipe boom construction could fix it. :vinzclortho:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/XgIx4obsFJU?feature=oembed&wmode=opaque

all I know is that this is nothing to do with [the video game](https://www.gbfans.com/wiki/games/ghostbusters-the-video-game).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rockmx8](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@rockmx8](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/rockmx8)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2008, 5:28am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/16 "2008-05-31T05:28:06Z")

</div>

There is definitely a GB3 CGI Movie in development and is going to debut a Teaser Trailer at the Comic Con, Stay Tuned… 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clortho](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/clortho/32/5948_2.png) [@clortho](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/clortho)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2008, 6:25am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/17 "2008-05-31T06:25:25Z")

</div>

> [@rockmx8](#):
>
> There is definitely a GB3 CGI Movie in development and is going to debut a Teaser Trailer at the Comic Con, Stay Tuned… 🙂

How much do I get if you’re wrong?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kingpin](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/kingpin/32/19463_2.png) [@kingpin](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/kingpin)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2008, 12:37am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/18 "2008-06-01T00:37:20Z")

</div>

> [@rockmx8](#):
>
> There is definitely a GB3 CGI Movie in development and is going to debut a Teaser Trailer at the Comic Con, Stay Tuned… 🙂

Enough! You’ve made your point more than clearly, rock.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![axelghostbuster](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/cab0a1/32.png) [@axelghostbuster](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/axelghostbuster)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2008, 1:31am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/19 "2008-06-01T01:31:30Z")

</div>

well i think live action would be totally way awsome! the more realistic it is the better for the movie! a lot of detailings specially for screen grabs! nice close ups for us the the fans to enjoy it all for t5he GB propsters and GB Artists! like me lol! realistic would totally rock out loud! and bust out every other movies to #1 in the box office at least for a month long lol!🆒 !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zack](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/f6c823/32.png) [@Zack](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Zack)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2008, 1:49am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791/20 "2008-06-01T01:49:21Z")

</div>

Heeey [Ghostbusters 3](https://www.gbfans.com/wiki/ghostbusters-3) is gonna come out in 1992! Or better yet, 1994! 😃

[Next page](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/cgi/2791.md?page=2)
