# My Thoughts....

**URL:** <https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940>\
**Category:** Ghostbusters: Answer the Call (2016)\
**Created:** [January 26, 2011, 8:41am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940 "2011-01-26T08:41:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicholszz](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/e68b1a/32.png) [@Nicholszz](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Nicholszz)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2011, 11:45pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/23 "2011-02-01T23:45:14Z")

</div>

> [@njukgb](#):
>
> > [@Nicholszz](#):
> >
> > Stuff
> 
> You respond with that ‘your points make no sense’… and don’t offer any counter-points to support your ‘thoughts’. You truly are lacking the ability to communicate any attempt to respond.

And your ‘moving along’ is any different?

I have nothing to say to you telling me I am wrong, I am not here to argue. Just laugh at you in attempts to make me…

What exactly is your goal? Sorry I do not understand. Would you like me to get angry?

I believe you are entitled to your opinion, as much as I am entitled to mine.

Your only defense against me so far is… Lets see here… Something about car crashes.

And I really do not see how it relates to your opinion on my thoughts.

Maybe if you explained it in better detail I could counter your replies with more in depth replies.

Until then, not sure what to to tell you.

I just do not understand what you are saying.

There was a joke in hear about my english being bad?

Well I believe yours is. I mean you have ‘IMPLIED’ since you love to say I imply lots, I figured it is best to communicate with you.

You have implied that you ‘Never mis-word things.’

Okay, I can maybe understand that. But what you lack is details.

I mean if I came up to you and was like.

“Yah the other day I saw something.”

Wouldn’t you question what I saw?

Maybe where I saw it?

This is the best way I can explain why I am not giving you detailed feedback.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njukgb](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/48db29/32.png) [@njukgb](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/njukgb)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2011, 12:16am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/24 "2011-02-02T00:16:36Z")

</div>

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> And your ‘moving along’ is any different?

Yes. You expected an actual counter-point to that you said I was observant?

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> What exactly is your goal? Sorry I do not understand. Would you like me to get angry?

There was no goal - it was in response to that you are mistaken on your understanding on that a film, such as Ghostbusters, could be produced without any member of the public being aware.

And that you made a point of;

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> Alott of TV is done in studio these days, NEVER on location. Someone goes, takes wide screen pictures. The rest is done with green screen.

Again, unless [Ghostbusters 3](https://www.gbfans.com/wiki/ghostbusters-3) is a made-for-tv movie, most films shoot on location. And your point that Ghostbusters could be shooting now - and all be in studio on green screen with the car hidden in garages and closed off streets - is incorrect.

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> Your only defense against me so far is… Lets see here… Something about car crashes

That was an example of how your point of ‘NEVER on location’ is incorrect. If they never film on location what is your explanation as to how there are high-profile films having car crashes on public streets - in full view of the public.

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> There was a joke in hear about my english being bad?

Are you stating or asking a question? Either way I know - from me - there was no joke about your English. I was making a correlation between your lack of counter-point to a solid example that your statement of ‘NEVER on location’ (again) is incorrect.

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> I mean you have ‘IMPLIED’ since you love to say I imply lots,

I used ‘imply’ once - that hardly qualifies as ‘lots’.

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> You have implied that you ‘Never mis-word things.’

I never implied this - nor did I make any statement remotely referencing this.

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> But what you lack is details.

Details, on what? Transformers 3 has car crash, during filming, on public street - the detail would be exactly that.

The Sorcerers Apprentice has car crash, during filming, on public street - again, the detail would be exactly that.

Are you looking for further details?

[![](https://discdn.gbfans.com/original/3X/d/a/da65efa0b8a4bb7e253428174f61f5a12aacf5b0.jpeg "Transformers 3 - Bumblebee Crashes Into Real Police Car") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPy7cdLACbk)

Notice all the public standing in the background witnessing this film that is shooting “NEVER on location”.

[![](https://discdn.gbfans.com/original/3X/3/3/338249216d610b60d49354027accf2c191e89ea7.jpeg "Nicholas Cage's Stunt Driver Wrecks Ferrari at Time Square") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFuyFl8OTSo)

Notice all the public standing around witnessing this film that is shooting “NEVER on location”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicholszz](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/e68b1a/32.png) [@Nicholszz](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Nicholszz)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2011, 6:35am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/25 "2011-02-02T06:35:19Z")

</div>

Yah dude… Still not understanding you.

So you work in the movie business do you?

Must be cool. I mean how you know how everything works down to the exact detail.

Also I said ‘Alott of TV is done in studios.’

Sorry, If I realized I had to be 100% specific with you I would have said.

‘Alott of FILMING RELATED MEDIA’

As for your car crash videos… Yah dude. I get your point on the car crashes… Do you really have to bring it up in every single post?

Also alot of landmarks appear. Or city buses. Or BUILDINGS, or omfg people?

Really. Not seeing your arguement here.

Do you get told often you make no sense?

Let me be the first to tell you again that you make none at all.

When you have a better arguement, by all means contact me.

But for now your Car Crashes, and supposed logic about films is nothing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skadan](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/skadan/32/179845_2.png) [@skadan](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/skadan)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2011, 4:55pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/26 "2011-02-02T16:55:39Z")

</div>

To his defense, some movies are able to have “closed sets” in which strictly the cast and crew are allowed on set, meaning no fanboys snapping photos for their websites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doctor-venkman](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/doctor-venkman/32/186591_2.png) [@doctor-venkman](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/doctor-venkman)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2011, 5:20pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/27 "2011-02-02T17:20:43Z")

</div>

You’re seriously sticking to your point that they could close down large sections of a city, and have no one be able to have a camera to film or take pictures of anything as recognizable as Ghostbusters?

No. You’re wrong. The movie could not be entirely filmed with green screens and be secretly filming right now. That is not happening, nor will it happen. Sony will capitalize on the marketing boom that can be created by reviving an old franchise much like was done with Indiana Jones.

You’re the only one not making sense. A major sequel to one of the biggest film franchises of all time is going to somehow manage to secretly film, and not have any marketing until right up before the release… right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Guy](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Guy](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Some_Guy)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2011, 6:44pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/28 "2011-02-02T18:44:47Z")

</div>

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> Yah dude… Still not understanding you.
> 
> So you work in the movie business do you?
> 
> Must be cool. I mean how you know how everything works down to the exact detail.
> 
> Also I said ‘Alott of TV is done in studios.’
> 
> Sorry, If I realized I had to be 100% specific with you I would have said.
> 
> ‘Alott of FILMING RELATED MEDIA’
> 
> As for your car crash videos… Yah dude. I get your point on the car crashes… Do you really have to bring it up in every single post?
> 
> Also alot of landmarks appear. Or city buses. Or BUILDINGS, or omfg people?
> 
> Really. Not seeing your arguement here.
> 
> Do you get told often you make no sense?
> 
> Let me be the first to tell you again that you make none at all.
> 
> When you have a better arguement, by all means contact me.
> 
> But for now your Car Crashes, and supposed logic about films is nothing.

**HIS POINT IS THAT FILMS ARE STILL SHOT ON LOCATION. IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE [GHOSTBUSTERS 3](https://www.gbfans.com/wiki/ghostbusters-3), IT WILL BE SHOT ON LOCATION IN SOME PARTS, WHILE OTHERS WILL BE USED IN LOS ANGELES AND VERY FEW IN CLOSED SETS.**

Christ.

And for the love of God it’s “ **A lot** ” TWO WORDS, ONE T.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/carpeteria/32/4011_2.png) [@Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Carpeteria)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2011, 2:23pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/29 "2011-02-03T14:23:21Z")

</div>

> [@Nicholszz](#):
>
> Sometimes a movie can be in speculation forever, and then all of a sudden a trailer comes out a few days before release.

Sorry, but when has this EVER happened? Why in the world would any studio spend millions of dollars on a movie, and then just release information about it only “days” before it was released? Every trailer I’ve seen has come out months ahead of the movie’s actual release in order to create buzz and get people excited and talking about it. Most major movies these days have at least two separate trailers, a teaser, and a full. This is accompanied by teaser posters and official posters as well, not to mention websites, advertising, billboards, etc. They want the biggest return on their movies as possible, and unless they’re using viral marketing like Blair Witch Project or Paranormal Activity did to create a mystery buzz, they’re going to shove it down your throat, constantly, until they get every dollar they can.

In this age of constant information, it’s pretty close to literally impossible to keep full wraps on any major motion picture production. Look at all the leaks about the new Spiderman reboot, for instance. It seems like there’s new pictures from the set every day, now. Websites like Aint it Cool News wouldn’t exist if this wasn’t so. Even before the days of the Internet and cell phone cameras, etc., studios had a hard time keeping production a secret. When LFL was making Return of the Jedi, they called it “Blue Harvest” in all official communication to throw people off, but word still got out.

I just don’t buy your notion that any movie made at this level could ever be done in secret, nor that it would ever be released without any fanfare or immense blitz of advertisement/marketing. If/when GB3 goes into production, everyone will know about it pretty quickly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/c68b51/32.png) [@ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ropzu)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2011, 12:41pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/30 "2011-02-19T12:41:34Z")

</div>

So anyway, do you guys pee on the side of the toilet bowl to make less splashing noise in public places?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gEkX](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/gekx/32/6229_2.png) [@gEkX](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/gEkX)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2011, 3:39pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/31 "2011-02-19T15:39:43Z")

</div>

I prefer right on the front lip so that it splashes on my legs. The sensation is amazing…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/c68b51/32.png) [@ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ropzu)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2011, 7:18pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/32 "2011-02-19T19:18:01Z")

</div>

> [@gEkX](#):
>
> I prefer right on the front lip so that it splashes on my legs. The sensation is amazing…

But what if you’re wearing a suit and you’re going to a meeting?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/carpeteria/32/4011_2.png) [@Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Carpeteria)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2011, 9:52pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/33 "2011-02-19T21:52:11Z")

</div>

> [@ropzu](#):
>
> So anyway, do you guys pee on the side of the toilet bowl to make less splashing noise in public places?

GET OUT OF MY HEAD. That’s MY secret technique.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/c68b51/32.png) [@ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ropzu)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2011, 10:39pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/34 "2011-02-19T22:39:20Z")

</div>

> [@Carpeteria](#):
>
> > [@ropzu](#):
> >
> > So anyway, do you guys pee on the side of the toilet bowl to make less splashing noise in public places?
> 
> GET OUT OF MY HEAD. That’s MY secret technique.

Lies, I’ve been doing that for long. There was once a time when I had been doing it for so long, that I always did that accidentally, even when I was alone.

Also sorry for my english. Being tipsy doesn’t help

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/carpeteria/32/4011_2.png) [@Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Carpeteria)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2011, 5:26am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/35 "2011-02-20T05:26:11Z")

</div>

Don’t try to ■■■■ me with your nonsensical language. I was there first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/c68b51/32.png) [@ropzu](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/ropzu)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2011, 12:10pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/36 "2011-02-20T12:10:16Z")

</div>

> [@Carpeteria](#):
>
> Don’t try to ■■■■ me with your nonsensical language. I was there first.

Let’s make a deal… it’s our common little technique. Tee hee! \<3

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/user_avatar/forum.gbfans.com/carpeteria/32/4011_2.png) [@Carpeteria](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Carpeteria)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2011, 4:08pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/37 "2011-02-20T16:08:41Z")

</div>

NO DEAL

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![julz](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/da6949/32.png) [@julz](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/julz)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2011, 7:52am UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/38 "2011-02-22T07:52:40Z")

</div>

Movies can defiantly be successfully filmed in front of a green screen with out going on location with out any loss in film quality , movie pacing or severe drop in actors performance! Just look at the star wars prequels…oooohhh wait a minute…

hmmm

:sigh:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicholszz](https://forum.gbfans.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/e68b1a/32.png) [@Nicholszz](https://forum.gbfans.com/u/Nicholszz)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2011, 9:41pm UTC](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940/39 "2011-02-22T21:41:23Z")

</div>

What all the hate aboot eh? I thought we could all be friends, and sit around and drink beer. Watch some hockey. Eh well its okay, I think I’ll just go chop some wood for wood stove. Its real cold out eh. I gotta keep warm somehow.

[Previous page](https://forum.gbfans.com/t/my-thoughts/33940.md?page=1)
