It was revealed that this is what the 4k release cover should look like:


It was revealed that this is what the 4k release cover should look like:


Sony should hire someone who knows how to use photoshop.
So are they trying to stand on their own? or ride the coattails of Ghostbusters? Because that quote and that synopsis seems like the latter. Out of all the quotes and reviews that the movie had â that is the one the marketing guruâs decide to slap on the box?
That certified fresh stampâŚhow desperate.
Well, Iâm sure Sony paid good money for all those lukewarm reviews, so.
To throw some positive mood slime around here:
How about imdb votes that generate a median of 7?
But as this was already discussed with Richardless and he agreed a lot of regular people gave the movie a 7+ why are you just rehashing that old gripe again?
Also, regarding the âdesperate fresh ratingâ: a lot of well received movies use that, as you can see here:
http://www.gbfans.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=42216&p=4879058#p4879058
Probably trying to reassure fans who are still hyperventilating that their favorite movies have been âerased.â
Really excited to get my copy!
So Iâm not the only one that thinks Kristen looks exceptionally hot in all the promo images?

I was afraid to say anything because of the sexism thing leaning so far the other way, but daaayum!
âMake em hard!â
I did laugh at the âcertified fresh on rotten tomatoesâ logo on the front of the cover. I donât think Iâve ever seen that on a DVD before.
They should have just went with this:

Here, I fixed it:


Looks like I have to repost this about the user ratings. It explains the user votes from IMDb instead of RT but I think the same rules apply.
You should delve a bit deeper in the numbers behind that outcome of 5.5/10.
It has a median of 7 for instance.
Look how many people voted a 10 or a 1. Both are considered biased votes in my opinion: I think if we remove those from the equation we can get a much more fair number.
All of a sudden the number 6,7,8 stand out in the reviews, with even the 9 having more percentage then the negative votes.

Blah blah blah. RT has Spaceballs at 54%. There goes their credentials. They wouldnât know a fresh tomato if I hit them in the temple with it.
The example I used are from user votes, not reviews from critics.
(And RT just combines critic reviews into a percentage. It does not create the reviews.)
Bottom line, both audience and critics liked the movie.
Iâm just saying that these scores really donât mean anything to most people. Itâs just funny that theyâre toting that mediocre score on the damn cover.
Itâs like if your kid comes home with a C and you frame it on the wall like a trophy.
Paulie got a C in classic film adaptations! Atta boy! Who wants ice cream?
When most of your classmates got an F, that C- starts looking pretty good. ![]()
Come on, youâve seen Summer School!
As a straight C student, maybe I should be more sympatheticâŚ
Naaaah!
I only got Câs in Handwriting. And then, you know, I learned how to type. :eyeroll:
Which is why I showed you the user votes. They agree with the critics the movie earned itâs fresh certificate, which quite a lot of other well received movies have on their DVD covers as well.
I had the same conversation with featofstrength and he agreed it even his favorites (Mad Max, Creed) have them.
You donât need charts and graphs to tell good art from bad art.
From the looks of certain other stats, more people had the good sense to stay far away from that section of the theater.
I couldnât agree more.
Or they just didnât like a trailer and therefore missed out.
It is bothering you guys waaaay too much that some people actually liked this movie. Move on. Take up a real cause in life.