Ghostbusters Fans New Years Resolutions.

I do, like others because you don’t just let it happen, you indorse it.

So in short, more people, more reason to pick and choose therefore making cliques.

That speaks to why GBFans has a problem.

That part is true to a degree.

Sounds more like you don’t get it. As far as I see it you guys are the 4chan for Ghostbusters. Half the time reading over the threads, someone will post something, and the first thing that happens is the “few” will attack whatever it is no matter what. Seems that from your site like 4chan that is approved by what you have said here. I will note that in any future debates that bring up your site then.

One side note, while maybe I got the wrong perspective about this site, I do see a lot of personal information we all submit including myself. Such a thing doesn’t happen at your big brother site 4chan. That is one of many reasons you may want to either rethink this or remove the “community” term from your site description.

1 Like

I find it HILARIOUS, how when a forum is found out to be anything but a Utopia, The “man” or an “elite group” is out to get them. Its like this at EVERY large forum/site. This is heaven compared to the nonsense I used to mod at Undisclosed popular guitar-tab site.

The second somebody posts something and they’re not e-patted on the back for it, they feel attacked.

I don’t know how to explain how utterly misguided and/or incorrect your views are here without supporting your point about trolling. Fortunately I think this illustrates one of the main reasons for trolling, it’s easy. A user can either spend a long time typing a lengthy, well reasoned explanation of why someone is wrong about something and hope that makes the target change their position or else they can post a quick troll/meme response that will just make the person shutup and/or go away. Either way the “troll-ee” person is “fixed” and the site remains status quo for the “troll-er”.

As an attepemt to address your views:

“Half the time reading over the threads”

means the other half of the time the site is useful, helpful and productive, this is not the case for 4chan.

"the first thing that happens "

…is a few dozen people read the thread and don’t comment at all.

"the “few” will attack whatever it is "

Most of the current “the few” are on post approval and “the few” in general depends on when you were on the site. There are plenty of people who used to be trolls who aren’t (or aren’t as much) now, have moved on or been banned from the site or were only trolling for specific reasons of periods of time. There has never been a set core of trolls on the site.

“no matter what”

Utterly incorrect. There is ALWAYS a reason for trolling. It may be because a certain user posted the troll has issue with, it may be the topic that was posted, it may be due to a current meme running around, it could just be the horrible grammar and spelling of the OP. It’s never(ok, hardly ever) random.

“Seems that… …that is approved by what you have said here.”

Drawing conclusions like this makes no sense to me. You’re applying evidence of how things used to be to how they are currently. Historically AJ and the mods have been unable to keep up with the forums, even after the last round of moderator additions (at which point I was added) it’s still not possible to maintain the entire site. With a second crop of new moderators we will get closer to the goal of even moderation but this is still a work in progress.

Along those lines, just because you don’t like/understand/approve of something does not necessarily make it wrong/against the rules/trolling. This is not a democracy, AJ is not a benevolent and fair god. He is allowed to have opinions, views and be an utter jerk if he wants, it’s his sandbox. As he’s pointed out he wants the site to be open to all, that doesn’t mean everyone will want to be here.

“I will note that in any future debates that bring up your site”

Just so long as you’re tell people you’re quoting your own opinon and not actual fact in these “debates”

You had me at "AJ is not a benevolent and fair god. " LOL!

In the other major forums I frequent (which are 3D related), there are no real issues at all. They have a zero tolerance policy, period. They’ll delete a thread or lock it at the drop of a hat, and tell you if you don’t like it, to not let the door hit ya in the @$$ when you leave.

(Edit for reference, Daz3D, Zbrushcentral, and Renderosity)

For a while one even opened an unmoderated “free for all” forum, but it turned into a cesspool that they finally closed.

I’m all for fun n games, but there is just no reason to insult and harass people because they are less knowledgable then yourself, or don’t have refined nettiquette.

I’m probably less tolerant of it here because the other forums I frequent.

Interesting. Have you ever been to 4Chan? Have you ever been to Something Awful? I would gladly buy you a membership to Something Awful just for you to see how FRIENDLY we are in comparison.

As far as getting it. I nailed it on the head.. but once again I see you are lumping in ALL interactions you have had on the site and holding me responsible for people not liking you.

Earlier you compared GBFans to Nightsquad, and two other sites. If I recall, you came to GBFans, posted stuff without ‘thinking it through’ like you said. People didn’t like it and disagreed with you. So you threw a hissy fit. Later you were complaining to everyone that you deserved more respect because you were the lead editor for the Ghostbusters Wikia site. Individuals. Not ‘GBFans’ the site disagreed with you.

You ran off to Nightsquad assuming that since it was mostly banned members from GBFans, and people that hate GBFans that you would be accepted with open arms. You got a cold shoulder there too.

Later you came back to GBFans and had some more disagreements, and ended up posting very negative comments on Spook Central’s Facebook page of all places attacking GBFans AND ProtonCharging.com. Now you’re back having another disagreement.

To reiterate my point. Maybe its you.

Sorry for stepping in, but I’d just like to say that the announced changes look very promising. It looks like AJ and the gang are doing a lot of efforts to improve the site, and it’s really appreciated by me and (I’m sure) a whole lot of people. I look forward to a very exciting year on GBfans. :slight_smile:

I have to 2nd Alan Hawkins’ post

It would be sweet to have an Instructional/Tutorial Section. A place where building tutorials and wiring diagrams, etc… could be found, without reading though a 22 + page build-thread to find an answer. Don’t get me wrong, I love reading the pack builds and I know that a big part of the hobby is DIY and you learn by reading and experimenting, but, a one-stop shop for useful information would be :crunch:

/end 2¢

We have a tutorials section: GBFans.com

What about it isn’t working and needs changing? If it’s organization we recently added an index thread to the Proton Pack section to highlight useful threads and hope to do the same with other sections in the near future.

The main issue with tutorials is most people are making things for themselves and don’t have the time/inclination/money to do a step-by-step build thread and/or they’re just making it up as they go along anyway. There’s also a wide variety of ways to do things and it really depends on what parts your using anyway. Mounting a fiberglass pack shell to a motherboard is different from mounting an MDF scrachbuild or a plastic vaccform shell. That’s why we typically direct people to build threads as they can see a variety of ways things are done and pick what’s best for their situation. You’ll never have an Ikea diagram for a proton pack.

Sure, this is all true but it took me two months on this site before I found the wiki section. I was searching the forums like a good little noob and only tripped on the equipment section while looking at other people’s builds. My point is to slap some big ol’ training wheels on the forum and really take the new people by the hand and guide them. Build up a good audience that thinks along the lines of the community from the get go.

See, this is something I just don’t get. Is it a layout issue? Does the menu at the top here blend in too much? Do people not know that GBFans is an entire site and not just a forum? There are links to specific sections of the site below every main forum section, do people think they’re for show or not clickable?

The Tutorial section is fine there is a lot of great info there, but I’d like to see more "just getting started’ topics in there. Like the many ways to attach a Ion arm and other parts to your pack, or how to mount the motherboard to the A.L.I.C.E frame, suggested drill bits and screws to use…

Maybe that stuff is there and I’m not looking hard enough, or maybe it’s an organization thing like you mentioned. I dunno. What I do know is, there is tons of info here… it’s just a matter of finding it. :wink:

Look, you’ve been here for ten years. You know this site backwards and forwards. I’ve been here almost seven months and am still finding sections to this site I never thought to click. You guys have a nav tab called “fans” to me that did not sound like a source for prop info. In fact to me (mind you, I have been designing GUI’s since the mid 90’s) it sounds like having a nav tab in the top bar of facebook that says ‘facebook’. As someone trying to build a prop I really see no use in looking around what I assumed (incorrectly) was a section for fan art and fiction. Yet there is a wealth of builds in there.

You people asked for our thoughts on how to improve your site. I see a problem that will continue to create confusion and offered a simple solution. I’m currently an admin on a Vb site and a moderator on the Second City students forum. I know that it would take less than an afternoon of fiddling around to implement my ideas and if it did not work then the threads could be moved to the appropriate sections again and life would go back to normal.

Speaking of Second City there is a good saying I learned there. "Make a change before life forces you too… "

Like I said, this is just my opinion. I’ve been here a VERY short time and have been great full for the wealth of information contained here.

DevilManOzzy, I’d like to address a single comment you made. And I’d like to point out I’m not drawing this out as an attempt to gang-up on you or anything like that; the statement to which I am referring is just very jarring to me.

This line of quotes stem from you–and I am paraphrasing–saying you have to go out of your way here to watch what you say. This troubles me greatly, not because you have to do so, but rather because you think you should not have too.

I’m often chided for having over-the-top posts that pick apart minor nuances of what people have posted. I understand that my doing so is often unnerving and, can be, annoying to many. It is, however, second nature to me; it’s simply something I do naturally and in everyday conversation. Let me say this unequivocally,** I own what I say**. Everything I type is mine. It’s my thoughts, it’s my feelings, and I am the only one who posts them.

I certainly don’t expect everyone to put that level of thought into posts. In contrast, I think a great deal of communication should and is likely done without much reflection. However, you also claim issue with the more “troll-y” responses some people get 'round these parts. I think there is an inherent flaw in this position and in your position that you should not have to “think” about what you post.

By and large, my first reaction to very hastily built proton packs that still have duct-tape showing is “Well, that looks like ■■■■.” I don’t mean any disrespect to anyone with such and item as we all have to start somewhere. My first thought isn’t always the most politically correct or perhaps even socially proper thing to say, speak, or type. I think most people are like this. Many instances of people you see trolling are, in fact, people popping off at the mouth before they think.

To this degree, a lot of our members from outside of the United States–primarily in the UK(yes, I read those forums)–cite this as a problem. That we embrace freedom of speech to our own detriment. I believe there is merit to their claims. In contrast, many US users believe we stymie their ability to comment on things because we don’t let every snide or critical comment go. I believe there is a balance that must be struck and I think most would agree with that assertion.

Unfortunately, I think you are advocating for two things that are simply not compatible. When you juxtapose the two ideas (not putting thought in posts v. not allowing trolling) I believe you will realize that to prevent trolling, to some degree, we must hope that users think about what they are posting. Further, we can’t hold some users accountable for their actions and words without, also, applying the same standard to all users.

I was once of the mindset, erroneously, that removing users from the website was the solution to prevent trolling. I still think this is the appropriate remedy in some instances. See e.g.; when said trolling is veiled threats at someone’s bodily safety, is advocating users to “blow their heads off,” or the trolling is of such a grandiose scale that it pervades multiple websites and even begins to occur at real-world events as well. Otherwise, I realize that something I may view as kindhearted ribbing, you may view as an insult of the highest degree. Another common problem, for which there is no real solution, are posts in which a user expresses a point of view and is then met with a flurry of disagreeing views. The compound nature of the disagreeing views can be viewed as trolling or being ganged-up on; however, if each of those posts are well thought out then the problem is only one of perception.

If you see an easy solution to any of this, we’d all be more than glad to hear your thoughts. That goes for everybody. I know it’s the standard operating procedure around here to ignore me when I make such statements, but we really do consider user feedback. Despite popular opinion, we don’t label those who give us thoughts and opinions as problem users. We may disagree at times, but if people didn’t disagree then society would likely be stuck at the caveman stage. If it’s something a user isn’t willing to post, I do read private messages–and I can assure you if you ask me to keep them confidential, I shall. (Along those lines, I’ve been asking for someone to PM me a list of the ‘Heavies’ for over a year. I’ve yet to receive one.)

The Publication page I feel is to general to be honest. And I thought there was talk to change the title TOYS to MERCHANDISE and to incorporate more pages for things not related to toys to category the influx of Ghostbusters related items that are being found in stores.

Not adding to this debate, but I LOVE all the ideas that are presented here.

Adding to the debate: Follow the advice of our greatest wise men “Be execellent to each other.”

Because the right tab to click is the Equipment Section. :cool:

I think that AJ once talked about this: people don’t think to click on “Equipment” meaning it’ll mean “Props” since we’re like in-universe or something… But it’s still the most likely tab.

Today’s lesson: click everywhere! :stuck_out_tongue:

Just reread my last post. My apologies for being a dick. I know better than to post on the interwebs just before bed.

Sent from my DROID X2 using Ghostbusters Fans on Android

I’d like to suggest a new logo for the site:

I would suggest with the wiki that in addition to leaving it open to public edits, that we have some things that can be 100% confirmed to be accurate with proper proof to be ”locked in”. I believe that all of the community regardless of ”rank”, myself included would be more inclined to help update it when theres no longer a possibility of someone who isnt as seasoned in there studies making an edit over what was provided under the impression that they are correct. It would most definitely save alot of veteran and newer gb proppers alot of digging time in the process. A win win imo.

Whatcha guys think?