My Thoughts....

Ghostbusters Discussion Ghostbusters: Answer the Call (2016)
23

And your ‘moving along’ is any different?

I have nothing to say to you telling me I am wrong, I am not here to argue. Just laugh at you in attempts to make me…

What exactly is your goal? Sorry I do not understand. Would you like me to get angry?

I believe you are entitled to your opinion, as much as I am entitled to mine.

Your only defense against me so far is… Lets see here… Something about car crashes.

And I really do not see how it relates to your opinion on my thoughts.

Maybe if you explained it in better detail I could counter your replies with more in depth replies.

Until then, not sure what to to tell you.

I just do not understand what you are saying.

There was a joke in hear about my english being bad?

Well I believe yours is. I mean you have ‘IMPLIED’ since you love to say I imply lots, I figured it is best to communicate with you.

You have implied that you ‘Never mis-word things.’

Okay, I can maybe understand that. But what you lack is details.

I mean if I came up to you and was like.

“Yah the other day I saw something.”

Wouldn’t you question what I saw?

Maybe where I saw it?

This is the best way I can explain why I am not giving you detailed feedback.

24

Yes. You expected an actual counter-point to that you said I was observant?

There was no goal - it was in response to that you are mistaken on your understanding on that a film, such as Ghostbusters, could be produced without any member of the public being aware.

And that you made a point of;

Again, unless Ghostbusters 3 is a made-for-tv movie, most films shoot on location. And your point that Ghostbusters could be shooting now - and all be in studio on green screen with the car hidden in garages and closed off streets - is incorrect.

That was an example of how your point of ‘NEVER on location’ is incorrect. If they never film on location what is your explanation as to how there are high-profile films having car crashes on public streets - in full view of the public.

Are you stating or asking a question? Either way I know - from me - there was no joke about your English. I was making a correlation between your lack of counter-point to a solid example that your statement of ‘NEVER on location’ (again) is incorrect.

I used ‘imply’ once - that hardly qualifies as ‘lots’.

I never implied this - nor did I make any statement remotely referencing this.

Details, on what? Transformers 3 has car crash, during filming, on public street - the detail would be exactly that.

The Sorcerers Apprentice has car crash, during filming, on public street - again, the detail would be exactly that.

Are you looking for further details?

Notice all the public standing in the background witnessing this film that is shooting “NEVER on location”.

Notice all the public standing around witnessing this film that is shooting “NEVER on location”.

25

Yah dude… Still not understanding you.

So you work in the movie business do you?

Must be cool. I mean how you know how everything works down to the exact detail.

Also I said ‘Alott of TV is done in studios.’

Sorry, If I realized I had to be 100% specific with you I would have said.

‘Alott of FILMING RELATED MEDIA’

As for your car crash videos… Yah dude. I get your point on the car crashes… Do you really have to bring it up in every single post?

Also alot of landmarks appear. Or city buses. Or BUILDINGS, or omfg people?

Really. Not seeing your arguement here.

Do you get told often you make no sense?

Let me be the first to tell you again that you make none at all.

When you have a better arguement, by all means contact me.

But for now your Car Crashes, and supposed logic about films is nothing.

26

To his defense, some movies are able to have “closed sets” in which strictly the cast and crew are allowed on set, meaning no fanboys snapping photos for their websites.

27

You’re seriously sticking to your point that they could close down large sections of a city, and have no one be able to have a camera to film or take pictures of anything as recognizable as Ghostbusters?

No. You’re wrong. The movie could not be entirely filmed with green screens and be secretly filming right now. That is not happening, nor will it happen. Sony will capitalize on the marketing boom that can be created by reviving an old franchise much like was done with Indiana Jones.

You’re the only one not making sense. A major sequel to one of the biggest film franchises of all time is going to somehow manage to secretly film, and not have any marketing until right up before the release… right.

28

HIS POINT IS THAT FILMS ARE STILL SHOT ON LOCATION. IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE GHOSTBUSTERS 3, IT WILL BE SHOT ON LOCATION IN SOME PARTS, WHILE OTHERS WILL BE USED IN LOS ANGELES AND VERY FEW IN CLOSED SETS.

Christ.

And for the love of God it’s “A lot” TWO WORDS, ONE T.

29

Sorry, but when has this EVER happened? Why in the world would any studio spend millions of dollars on a movie, and then just release information about it only “days” before it was released? Every trailer I’ve seen has come out months ahead of the movie’s actual release in order to create buzz and get people excited and talking about it. Most major movies these days have at least two separate trailers, a teaser, and a full. This is accompanied by teaser posters and official posters as well, not to mention websites, advertising, billboards, etc. They want the biggest return on their movies as possible, and unless they’re using viral marketing like Blair Witch Project or Paranormal Activity did to create a mystery buzz, they’re going to shove it down your throat, constantly, until they get every dollar they can.

In this age of constant information, it’s pretty close to literally impossible to keep full wraps on any major motion picture production. Look at all the leaks about the new Spiderman reboot, for instance. It seems like there’s new pictures from the set every day, now. Websites like Aint it Cool News wouldn’t exist if this wasn’t so. Even before the days of the Internet and cell phone cameras, etc., studios had a hard time keeping production a secret. When LFL was making Return of the Jedi, they called it “Blue Harvest” in all official communication to throw people off, but word still got out.

I just don’t buy your notion that any movie made at this level could ever be done in secret, nor that it would ever be released without any fanfare or immense blitz of advertisement/marketing. If/when GB3 goes into production, everyone will know about it pretty quickly.

30

So anyway, do you guys pee on the side of the toilet bowl to make less splashing noise in public places?

31

I prefer right on the front lip so that it splashes on my legs. The sensation is amazing…

32

But what if you’re wearing a suit and you’re going to a meeting?

33

GET OUT OF MY HEAD. That’s MY secret technique.

34

Lies, I’ve been doing that for long. There was once a time when I had been doing it for so long, that I always did that accidentally, even when I was alone.

Also sorry for my english. Being tipsy doesn’t help

35

Don’t try to ■■■■ me with your nonsensical language. I was there first.

36

Let’s make a deal… it’s our common little technique. Tee hee! <3

37

NO DEAL

38

Movies can defiantly be successfully filmed in front of a green screen with out going on location with out any loss in film quality , movie pacing or severe drop in actors performance! Just look at the star wars prequels…oooohhh wait a minute…

hmmm

:sigh:

39

What all the hate aboot eh? I thought we could all be friends, and sit around and drink beer. Watch some hockey. Eh well its okay, I think I’ll just go chop some wood for wood stove. Its real cold out eh. I gotta keep warm somehow.